7.27
-0.03
A raw IMDb number lies. A cult thriller with 40k votes and a 7.9 isn't really beating a blockbuster with 900k votes and a 7.8. True Rating runs both through the same Bayesian weighting so you compare like with like - then puts them in the ring.
7.27
-0.03
7.24
-0.16
The true winner
Takes it by 0.03 points once both scores are weighted by their vote counts.
WR = ( v / (v + m) ) · R + ( m / (v + m) ) · C
The movie's own IMDb rating (1 - 10).
How many people actually voted on it.
The trust threshold - currently 25,000 votes.
The baseline every film leans toward - now 6.8.
A film with a handful of votes barely outweighs the baseline C, so a fluke 9.5 from 200 fans gets dragged back toward the average. No brigading to the top.
As votes climb past the threshold m, the film's own rating R takes over almost entirely. A proven hit is trusted to be exactly what the crowd says it is.
Both films are measured against the same baseline and threshold, so a niche cult favorite and a mainstream blockbuster finally sit on the same scale.
The trick is the balance between v / (v + m) and m / (v + m) - they always add up to 1. Low-vote films borrow confidence from the crowd average; high-vote films keep their own. That's the whole reason a 7.4 from 71k votes can quietly beat a 7.3 from 380k, or lose to it, depending on how much proof you demand.